firsteditionbfs: (Short trans people be doing stuff)
Angeal Hewley ([personal profile] firsteditionbfs) wrote2024-11-08 07:34 pm

COB Inbox

[placeholder to be made]
recreator: (♇ | Sun's distant light)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-11-18 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
The former.

While I've no reason to believe he would choose to lie intentionally, I am looking to confirm the validity of his statements, yes.

From what I understand, the catalyst for him receiving this knowledge in the first place was the result of fae magicks. Even if he was a part of this "Simulation" originally, there is no way for those of us outside of it to determine whether or not these memories - as they were presented to him - are entirely factual in nature.

Consider the distortions and exaggerations one might expect of dreams, of illusions. The fae I'm familiar with are easily capable of such feats.
recreator: (♇ | Early to rise)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-11-18 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[A pond... so it was a pond that did this...?]

[Perhaps it all sounds accusatory, as if Emet-Selch is trying to put off most of the blame onto the fae and convince everyone that Byleth's account isn't real. Though the truth of it is much simpler: he cannot fathom a world in which it could be real, despite Angeal being the second person to support the tale. Oh, he can accept the Amani Simulation existed. The part he can't accept is this other him's role in it all. Even if that world facilitated the relationships described to him, that he would ever in a million years allow himself to-]

[Even so, there's something about Angeal's words that ring true. Well can he imagine some other version of Byleth setting up a library for all to use. His own experiences, after all, paint him as an inquisitive and oddly caring individual despite his distinct lack of affect. The festival alone has proven that much.]


I'm well aware that it would be impossible to expect validation for every single claim that has been made (not to mention distinctly uncomfortable for all parties involved).

What you have shared is sufficient.

It was Byleth himself who suggested that I reach out to you for clarification, and what you have said matches with Elidibus's assertions.
recreator: (♇ | When the silence isn't quiet)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-11-18 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
[He'll ignore the comment about Elidibus's word being enough. While, yes, he would be able to tell if his colleague were telling him falsehoods, there are ways around such assurances. He wants to be certain. Mayhap some part of him is holding out for a revelation that would make it impossible for him to argue against the startling truth. But that is for him to mull over.]

It certainly seems "interesting". Though beyond that, not the sort of place I would consider for an extended holiday.

As to what my inquiries are for, I simply wanted to speak to those with first-hand experiences within the Simulation. Cross-referencing, if you will. Much of what I have heard has sounded - to put it plainly - unbelievable regardless of the information's source.

I am not one to trust what I hear blindly.
recreator: (♇ | Time circles endlessly)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-11-19 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Well, he got his facts from somewhere, clearly.

If what he witnessed in that pond wasn't a deception at all, then I suppose I'm left with little choice but to suspend my disbelief.
recreator: (♇ | Rise from the ashes)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-11-24 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
You may make whatever request you wish, though I cannot guarantee that I will see it granted.
recreator: (♇ | We first must see the end)

[personal profile] recreator 2024-12-30 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
[And yet that's the part that even now makes the least amount of sense to him. That this other "him" would be so honest about himself and what he - they - had gone through. Really, now, even if he did share so much, there's little reason for someone not of their brethren to come to respect him so much.]

[Hm. "Even the playing field", eh?]


Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say "nothing" could be lost. But, in the grand scheme of things, I admit the risk is negligible at best.

[Which might sound callous, but in reality, Emet-Selch is simply working out how bad of a thing getting to know this fellow better could actually be.]